2025 TAX AMENDMENTS; PROPOSED STAMP DUTY AMENDMENTS DO NOT CURE DEFECTS IN THE LAW

The Minister proposes an amendment to Schedule 2 to the Stamp Duty Act, to provide for nil duty for an agreement or memorandum of agreement executed or received in Uganda.

I need to warn at this point that Taxpayers better not celebrate just yet. This is because, the proposed amendment if passed into law might not in fact take away this liability. The Stamp Duty Act as it currently stands is littered with overlapping levies and one of these is the one the Minister proposes to do away with.

The tax sought to be done away with might still be brought home to a taxpayer by enforcing another provision. That other provision happens to be item 52 of Schedule 2 of the Stamp Duty Act, which levies Stamp Duty of a similar amount(Shs. 15000/=) on a RECEIPT as defined by section 2, for any money or other property the amount of value of which exceeds Shs. 50000 /=.

Section 2 of the Act defines the RECEIPT as follows;

“RECEIPT” includes a note, memorandum or writing whether the note, memorandum or writing is or is not signed with the name of a person,

(a) by which any money, or any bill of exchange, cheque or promissory note is acknowledged to have been received;

(b) by which any other movable property is acknowledged to have been received in satisfaction of a debt;

(c) by which a debt or demand, or any part of a debt or demand, is acknowledged to have been satisfied or discharged; or

(d) which signifies or imports the acknowledgment;

The definition of a receipt under that Section is so wide that it in fact includes and indeed refers to what essentially is an agreement and a Memorandum of an agreement.

Brand Marketing and Advertising Services in Cross Border Trade; Where and How does consumption Occur for VAT Purposes?

Marketing and advertising services aim to build brand goodwill, which is an intangible asset tied to specific territories. It is obvious that brand visibility and consumer engagement occur within the market targeted by the advertisements and brand marketing, in this case, Uganda.

Goodwill, in law, is territorial and can be quantified financially but this is tied down to the territory in which the reporting entity operates because again in law, goodwill only exists with the existence of trading activities in a particular market. 

This means the economic benefit sought when buying marketing services is goodwill enhancement. This economic benefit is therefore realized in the market where goodwill is enhanced as a result of the brand marketing and advertising targeting that market. In this case Uganda and most certainly not in the United States.

TAX TREATMENT OF MARKETING AND PROMOTIONS ‘FREEBEES’; LEARNING INSIGHTS FROM THE CROWN BEVERAGES CASE

In finance, a credit memo’s role is not to constitute payment for goods or services but rather to adjust accounting records to reflect a reduction in receivables. In simpler terms, a credit memo corrects or cancels a previous transaction, and as such, cannot logically be considered a form of payment for subsequent transactions

In this case, the Tribunal’s characterization of the transactions between the taxpayer and its distributor as “purchases’’ of promotional sodas and the description of the credit memo as a “form of payment” for those goods may be problematic.

The credit memo issued by Crown Beverages does not reflect a new or separate purchase. Instead, it can only be, either a reversal or adjustment of previous transactions between Crown Beverages and Lira Resort Enterprises Ltd or a promotion discount for which a promotion expense is recognised in Crown Beverages books. It can not be both.

For income tax reporting purposes, treating the credit memo as a payment method for a new separate sales transaction could lead to unintended consequences and, potentially, open up a loophole for a tax avoidance scheme.