The Tax Appeals Tribunal has delivered a landmark decision that strikes at the heart of URA’s aggressive enforcement and over-reach tendencies and restores the much-needed balance in the taxpayer-taxman relationship.
(TRADE WORTH ESTABLISHMENTS LTD V URA TAT APPLICATION 338 OF 2024)
In perhaps the strongest language yet from the Tribunal against the revenue body, TAT observed:
“On the whole, we find that the Respondent acted not only unlawfully but also with impunity and in total abuse of their powers and authority… Rather than doing this [refund VAT unlawfully collected], the Respondent orchestrated a phoney scheme to deny the Applicant their refund – a taxpayer, who is the very reason for the Respondent’s existence.”
Citing its earlier decision in Canaan Sites Limited v URA, TAT further emphasises the ethical and legal obligation of URA to return taxes not legally due: “Where the Respondent collects taxes that are not legally owed, it is generally expected to refund those amounts to the taxpayer… it has an ethical and legal obligation to return those funds to maintain trust in the tax system.”
