Category Archives: LAW PRACTICE

MRT Tax 2025 Year in Review: The Market and Key Tax Trends

As we draw the curtains on 2025, we reflect on a year defined by transformative shifts in the tax landscape, from local, regional and international standpoints.

2025 has also been a defining one for our firm across advisory, tax controversy, transactions practices, and we are grateful to our clients for the confidence placed in us through the sensitive and high‑stakes mandates we received, as you sought our guidance to help you navigate tax complexity with confidence.

We extend an equal amount of gratitude to our peers and collaborators–locally, regionally, and internationally.

A Year of Excellence, Collaboration, and Global Recognition

Our journey this year has been marked by significant milestones that reinforce MRT Tax’s position as a leading tax firm in Uganda.

Recognition and Rankings:

MRT Tax received nomination for the prestigious Tax Firm of the Year Award – Uganda at the ITR EMEA Tax Awards 2025 and was subsequently recognised in the ITR World Tax 2026 rankings as a Notable leading tax practice in Uganda.

The Founding Managing Partner, Mark Ruhindi received Individual Recognition as a Highly Regarded Practitioner-General Corporate Tax.

Strategic Alliances:

We entered into strategic collaborations with The Cragus Group, one of the GCC’s leading independent tax and transfer pricing firms, and Tax Consulting South Africa (TCSA), a market leader in taxation in South Africa.

These relationships significantly enhanced our ability to advise our clients in international trade on cross‑border structuring, transfer pricing, and international tax risk that crosses into those key trade and investment corridors and vice-versa.

2025 OECD Rules Update on Remote Workers: Tax Insights on Cross-Border Human Capital Management.

The 2025 OECD Model Convention Update on the International Taxation concept of Permanent Establishments(PE) has fundamentally redefined Human Capital and Workforce Management in the context of cross-border remote working. 

These changes, which African nations like Uganda are expected to localise as domestic tax law, widens cross-border tax risk exposure for Multi-National Enterprises(MNEs) beyond commercial presence through physical offices. The news rules recognise the notion of commercial presence through human capital and remote workers working from a home or a similar place in another jurisdiction.

This opinion critically analyses the PE concept and its application to cross-border remote working in the context of Uganda’s current PE law, and further discusses the likely implications of the update from two perspectives:

First, the implications for global and regional firms and technology start-ups scaling across borders, with emphasis on emerging human capital management complications likely to arise once African countries, including Uganda, localise the update into domestic tax law.
Secondly, the opinion discusses the advantages it offers to tax administrations(OECD Member nations and nations that eventually localise the update into domestic law), particularly on combating tax avoidance by multinational enterprises (MNEs).

For the non-technical readers, I will be returning to explain the concept of a PE in simple terms but below are the new changes in brief:

The New Test: A PE is now strongly indicated if an employee works from a home office in State A for 50% of their total working time for their Non-Resident employer in State B AND there is a commercial reason for their presence in state A (e.g, servicing local clients and time-zone alignment). The changes have explicitly rejected cost saving or employee convenience as sole justification for remote cross-border working.
Impact on Tax Administration: The update is a powerful anti-avoidance tool for Tax Authorities, allowing them to assert taxing rights based on functional substance rather than just legal form(e.g work-from-anywhere contract clauses permitting cross-border remote working), materially expanding the tax base beyond the current 183-day Service PE rule.

Headache for MNEs and Tech Start-ups: The new rules transform low-cost, agile market testing for tech start-ups into a high-cost compliance burden for start-ups and other regional businesses trying to enter new markets and to scale across-borders. 

The rules will likely result in immediate, non-negotiable Payroll, Social Security, and Immigration risk above Corporate Income Tax, aggressively eroding the limited cash runway of young scaling companies, and rope companies into a more complex compliance matrix.

Navigating Foreign Income Taxation in Uganda: Key Tax Insights on Offshore Asset holdings

In the last quarter of 2025, a significant number of Ugandans in the diaspora alongside resident High-Networth taxpayers with offshore interests received emails from the Uganda Revenue Authority (URA) conveying a directive that might be signaling the end of “Offshore Anonymity” for Ugandan Taxpayers

In the emails, URA informs taxpayers that it has received information indicating that “you have earned foreign income or gains” and that “Preliminary analysis indicates that one or more foreign financial accounts or assets associated with your name and TIN”

The taxpayer are then given seven days to review and regularize their tax affairs before commencement of a formal investigation.

This is not routine correspondence, but rather one that marks a new phase in Uganda’s tax administration, one defined by unprecedented financial transparency and access to foreign financial information regarding the commercial activities of taxpayers.

The notices confirm that Uganda has fully operationalized the global data-exchange framework built around the OECD’s Multilateral Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters (MAAC), following the Uganda Parliament’s enactment of the Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters (Implementation) Act, 2023.

Under this framework, Foreign Jurisdictions volunteer taxpayer information on income generating asset holdings, transactions that might have resulted in taxable gains, emoluments subject to tax in Uganda, among other categories of information relevant to tax administration.

KRA Vs Sendy: Kenya’s High Court VAT Precedent Threatens East Africa’s Gig Economy and Digital Commerce Growth.

Kenya’s High Court has recently delivered a Key decision in the battle over VAT in the ride-hailing/digital platform economy, that risks far-reaching ripple effects across East Africa’s digital commerce landscape. 

The landmark decision fundamentally reclassifies digital platforms as primary suppliers of gig-economy services for VAT purposes. This brings them fully into the VAT net and forces gig workers/entrepreneurs and small merchants into VAT compliance, with potentially far-reaching consequences for the growth, structure, and taxation of the East African digital economy.

The immediate tax implication is that we now have two VATable transactions in every ride or delivery processed through a digital platform operating a similar business model. These are;

Supply from motor vehicle owner to tech platform (input VAT for the platform)

Supply from tech platform to end consumer (output VAT to the tax authorities on full final consideration paid by the end consumer)

This new reality is problematic from a commercial point of view, taking into consideration the nature and level of tax sophistication of most African economies.

The other immediate implication is that thousands of gig-economy participants have been hit with a VAT compliance shock overnight, and the reason is simple; e-commerce platforms lose input VAT if they trade with non-compliant taxpayers. Exposure to commercial activities of too many Non-VAT Traders or informal taxpayers makes the platform’s business model commercially unviable and wipes out margins.

Uganda’s Tax Exemption for Start-Ups: Key Insights for Entrepreneurs.

This fiscal year’s tax amendments included certain key amendments that have been hailed as a critical step in the right direction for tax administration, and particularly the tax exemptions provisions targeting start-ups and similar fledgling businesses.

​The amendment introduced new tax law aimed at fostering and supporting well formalised entrepreneurship, in the form of an income tax exemption for Uganda Citizen owned businesses started after 1st July 2025, for three-years.

Its practical application however requires a precise understanding of how the Uganda Revenue Authority (URA) interprets “new business,”, “associated entities,” and “Compliance” among other tax nomenclature. Yes, as with all incentives, the opportunity lies in the detail. This article seeks to address this detail.

East Africa Trade: Uganda’s Tax Appeals Tribunal clarifies on EAC Intra-Trade VAT

The Tax Appeals Tribunal has delivered a landmark decision that strikes at the heart of URA’s aggressive enforcement and over-reach tendencies and restores the much-needed balance in the taxpayer-taxman relationship.

(TRADE WORTH ESTABLISHMENTS LTD V URA TAT APPLICATION 338 OF 2024)

In perhaps the strongest language yet from the Tribunal against the revenue body, TAT observed:

“On the whole, we find that the Respondent acted not only unlawfully but also with impunity and in total abuse of their powers and authority… Rather than doing this [refund VAT unlawfully collected], the Respondent orchestrated a phoney scheme to deny the Applicant their refund – a taxpayer, who is the very reason for the Respondent’s existence.”

Citing its earlier decision in Canaan Sites Limited v URA, TAT further emphasises the ethical and legal obligation of URA to return taxes not legally due: “Where the Respondent collects taxes that are not legally owed, it is generally expected to refund those amounts to the taxpayer… it has an ethical and legal obligation to return those funds to maintain trust in the tax system.”

Uganda Revenue Authority goes after the Digital Economy: Payments Systems and third-Party Transaction Information in Tax Administration.

Whereas the digital economy is mostly composed of digital companies and the web-based commercial marketplace, the brick-and-mortar businesses are also covered since most now take payment through digital payment systems.

What this means is that digital payment systems now permeate nearly every sector, blurring the line between the traditional and digital economy.

The internet marketplace and the digital economy are data-driven and therefore I anticipate the next stage of the government’s tech-driven tax compliance enforcement campaign to be deployment of big data analytics and artificial intelligence in building taxpayer profiles using third-party payments and financial services information to flag transactions that would otherwise have escaped the tax net.

Sectors such as E-commerce, Gaming, Financial Services (fintech), and Telecoms process hundreds of thousands and for some, even millions of daily transactions.

Unlike a few years ago when tax authorities had no means of scrutinising such an
overwhelming volume of transactions and to assess tax upon each and every one including the tiniest of transactions.

Currently, Tax Authorities are able to rely on advanced data analytics and the deployment of artificial intelligence tools to track tax on even the smallest of transactions.

Uganda VAT E-INVOICING(EFRIS) Enforcement: Compliance Insights for Landlords and Tenants.

While initially criticised as premature and fought by taxpayers especially those under the KACITA umbrella, it appears the system is here to stay and has increasingly become the backbone of Uganda’s tax administration.

For commercial property landlords, who fall within the VAT net, strict EFRIS compliance marks a significant shift and fundamentally alters governance and tax reporting obligations for entities, which in turn poses risk to investments controlled under those entities.

The reason is simple; VAT administration directly intersects with income tax and rental tax compliance in a manner many lay taxpayers do not yet appreciate. The increased VAT scrutiny through EFRIS has a direct bearing on the landlord’s other tax compliance obligations under income tax and rental tax.

Landlords and property managers must therefore consider adjusting operating models to align with URA’s strict stance, as informal practices will expose them to heavier tax risk through deduction disallowances, penalties, additional tax assessments and a heavier professional fees burden.

Government Contract Bidding in Uganda: Key Tax Considerations for Bidders and Contractors.

Having regard to the sector, nature and scale of a taxpayer’s commercial activities, a government contractor, an investor trying to structure a government contracting arm of an existing business, might need to try to appreciate the Tax Exemptions regime and how it applies to both their existing and future contracts with the government, across the different tax heads.

When bidding for government contracts in Uganda, one of the most critical but often overlooked areas of tax due diligence is the identification and navigation of tax advantages available to the contractor, in the form of exemptions and reduced duty rates under the different tax heads.

The proper utilisation of exemptions not only ensures tax compliance but also creates direct tax savings that can materially influence the competitiveness of a bid and ultimately, the profitability of the project.

Uganda’s Real Estate Sector Faces Heightened Tax Scrutiny

Commercial activities in Uganda’s Real Estate sector have not been subjected to the same level of tax scrutiny as other lucrative industries, largely due to the informal character of the bulk of transactions and real estate activities generally.

We now expect more audits in the Real Estate Sector and transactions that have since been concluded and those to be concluded going forward.

And so Taxpayers in real estate may now need to take steps to fully formalize their activities for compliance purposes under the different tax heads.