Subscribe to our newsletter to read all our in-depth commentaries and to have the latest insights sent to your email
UGANDA TAX LEGISLATION ALERT | AUGUST 2026
Commentary Author: Mark Ruhindi
Statutory reference:
Uganda’s Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 2026 and Excise Duty (Amendment) Act, 2026 have received presidential assent and are now law in force.
This commentary re-examines our legislative discussion and analysis of these two components of the FY2026/27 tax package as proposals and Parliamentary Bills.
The commentary accordingly guides on which measures survived, which changed, and which did not enter the enacted regime, what taxpayers must implement and practical compliance recommendations.
Key Commentary Takeaways
PAYE relief moves to payroll implementation. The restructured resident-individual bands analysed in our earlier PAYE commentary are now contained in Schedule 4 of the Income Tax Act. For employers applying the ordinary resident-individual rates through payroll, the change is an immediate and urgent compliance obligation.
Income-tax collection closer to the point of payment. The amended Act deploys specific withholding regimes for qualifying debenture interest, betting and gaming winnings, telecommunications commissions and payments to public entertainers. These provisions increase the importance of identifying the nature of a payment before it is made rather than dealing with the tax consequence only at year end.
Individual rental income taxpayers may elect to comply monthly. Several prominent Income Tax proposals provisions changed materially. The final rental-income provision, for example, permits rather than compels monthly provisional returns by individuals.
Excise duty supplies the clearest reason businesses should return to the final statutory text. The plastics duty is now 2.5% or USD 70 per tonne, whichever is higher, substantially lower than the rate presented at the legislative stage. Cement, sugar and several other affected products similarly illustrate why implementation must rest on the Act rather than earlier legislative expectations.
Executive Summary
Earlier this year our commentary on Uganda’s 2026 tax amendments examined the direction of the measures while the legislative process remained open. We identified a package marked by wider collection at source, selective tax relief, greater visibility of taxable payments, and excise measures capable of feeding directly into business costs and consumer prices. That broad policy direction remains visible in the final Income Tax and Excise Duty Acts.
The revised resident-individual tax bands are now employment-income tax law. The revised withholding architecture across several tax heads also remains, although its application depends on the particular statutory category. Investment incentives continue to be selective and heavily conditional.
Several controversial Income Tax proposals identified at Bill stage do not appear in the final Act. Under Excise Duty, some of the most commercially sensitive figures changed materially during the legislative process.
For taxpayers the enactments may require a reconciliation exercise across payroll systems, financing arrangements, withholding procedures, transaction classifications, pricing, contracts and tax-compliance systems so that they align with the new law.
Resident Individual Rates and PAYE
The resident-individual income-tax changes display the clearest continuity between the earlier proposals and the final law.
Our earlier PAYE commentary recorded an upward adjustment of the tax-free threshold and a restructuring of the lower and middle resident-individual bands. We also observed that the relative benefit would be strongest at the lower end of the income scale, while higher earners would retain the higher marginal-rate structure.
Schedule 4 now substitutes new resident-individual income-tax bands. For employees whose employment income is taxed through the ordinary resident-individual PAYE framework, that change carries an immediate payroll consequence.
The annual nil-rate threshold rises from UGX 2.82 million under the previous Schedule 4 to UGX 4.02 million under the amended Schedule. The lower and middle bands are likewise restructured before the 30% rate applies.
| Annual chargeable income | Rate of tax |
| Not exceeding UGX 4,020,000 | Nil |
| Over UGX 4,020,000 but not exceeding UGX 4,920,000 | 20% of the amount exceeding UGX 4,020,000 |
| Over UGX 4,920,000 but not exceeding UGX 5,820,000 | UGX 180,000 plus 25% of the amount exceeding UGX 4,920,000 |
| Over UGX 5,820,000 but not exceeding UGX 120,000,000 | UGX 405,000 plus 30% of the amount exceeding UGX 5,820,000 |
| Over UGX 120,000,000 | The ordinary computation, together with the additional 10% charge on the amount exceeding UGX 120,000,000 |
The distributional effect identified in our earlier analysis therefore broadly survives. The reform confers its largest relative benefit around the lower end of the tax schedule while still reducing liability for taxpayers further up the bands.
What has changed most fundamentally is the legal status of that analysis.
For PAYE, the policy debate has become a payroll-implementation issue: the revised resident-individual bands are now the statutory rates against which employers must configure withholding.
Employers should therefore review payroll tables, effective-date settings, employee communications and reconciliation procedures so that their systems reflect the enacted bands.
Withholding Tax: Collection Continues to Move Closer to Payment
A recurring feature of the Income Tax amendments is the use of identifiable payment points as tax-collection mechanisms. This continues the wider movement of collection closer to the transaction. Rather than relying exclusively on annual returns and subsequent assessment, the legislation increasingly places collection obligations on persons who control a payment when it is made.
The final Act confirms that direction, although the different withholding regimes should not be treated as a single general rule. Below are the affected taxpayer categories under the new law.
Debenture Interest
Section 82(5), read together with the new paragraph 2A of Part V of Schedule 4, imposes withholding at 5% on interest paid by a resident company in respect of qualifying debentures to a non-resident person.
The provision is subject to specific conditions. The debentures must have been issued outside Uganda to raise a loan outside Uganda; the statutory wide-issuance and business-use condition must be met or the interest must be paid to a bank or financial institution of a public character; and the interest must be paid outside Uganda.
The provision may therefore affect financing costs, gross-up provisions, change-in-law clauses and the contractual allocation of tax between borrower and lender. It should not, however, be treated as a general 5% withholding tax on every foreign loan. The statutory conditions remain central to its application.
Betting and Gaming Winnings
The substituted section 131 requires withholding on payments of betting or gaming winnings at 15%.
The Act defines “winnings” as the difference between the pay-out and the staked amount. It also excludes winnings paid by a person licensed to conduct a national lottery under section 23 of the Lotteries and Gaming Act.
The provision therefore strengthens collection at the player-payment point while retaining a defined statutory exclusion.
Telecommunications Commissions
The substituted section 133 requires telecommunications service providers to withhold tax on the gross amount of commissions paid for:
- telecommunications retail services;
- mobile network services; and
- provision of mobile-money services.
The applicable rate under Schedule 4 is 10%.
For telecom and mobile-money distribution networks, the amendment reinforces the importance of accurately classifying commission payments, maintaining payee records and ensuring that withholding systems are aligned to the payment flows actually used in the business.
Public Entertainers
New section 135B requires withholding on payments to public entertainers at 6% of the gross payment.
The definition is deliberately broad. It reaches persons performing publicly or before a camera or microphone for entertainment, artistic or similar purposes, including performers participating in public entertainment events or activities open to the public, and extends to stage, radio, television and digital performers.
The provision therefore reaches further than conventional live entertainment.
The breadth of this definition carries particular significance for the content-creation economy. By extending expressly beyond traditional stage performers to persons who perform before a camera or microphone for entertainment, artistic or similar purposes, and by specifically including digital performers, the provision is capable of capturing much of the entertainment value now commercialised through social media and other digital platforms.
This has particular importance in brand and advertising arrangements. Where a business pays a content creator to fulfil a contractual obligation to appear in, create, present or publish branded content (whether an endorsement, promotional video, sponsored post, product placement or similar advertising deliverable), the payment may fall within the public-entertainer withholding regime if what is being remunerated is the creator’s performance or entertainment value. The analysis must therefore turn on the substance of the contractual deliverable rather than the label attached to the payment.
Businesses operating in media, events and digital content and those that make payments in that space should conduct an analysis of whether the routine payments made within those commercial arrangements fall within the statutory definition and comply accordingly to avoid controversy down the road.
Technical Income Tax Changes Businesses Should Not Overlook
The resident-individual and withholding changes will attract immediate attention, but some of the more technical amendments may prove equally important for businesses involved in cross-border, digital and related-party transactions.
Software, Royalties and Digital Services
The Act expressly inserts software into the statutory royalty definition. It also amends section 86 so that the section does not apply to income attributable to royalties.
Read together, the amendments increase the importance of characterisation in software and digitally delivered transactions. They do not mean that every payment connected with software automatically becomes royalty income. The correct treatment still requires the transaction to be analysed against the amended statutory definition.
Where income is properly attributable to royalties, the exclusion from section 86 becomes separately relevant.
For technology suppliers, purchasers and businesses entering licensing, subscription, hosting, distribution and similar arrangements, contractual terminology alone should therefore not be expected to determine the tax treatment. The legal and commercial substance of the arrangement remains important.
Arm’s-Length Compliance Becomes Express in the Act
New section 115A requires a person entering a controlled transaction or series of controlled transactions to account for those transactions in a manner consistent with the arm’s-length principle. A controlled transaction is defined for this purpose as a transaction between associates.
This should not be understood as introducing a new tax concept into Ugandan law. Uganda already possessed a transfer-pricing framework governing transactions between associates; the provision merely reinforces the existing anti-avoidance architecture.
The significance lies instead in the fact that the amendment places an express general taxpayer-facing arm’s-length compliance obligation directly into the principal Act.
For businesses with related-party transactions, this reinforces the need to align intercompany agreements, pricing policies, transfer-pricing documentation and actual conduct. Transfer pricing becomes difficult to defend where the written policy, the contractual arrangement and the transaction actually performed point in different directions.
Rental Income
Earlier discussion of the tax package contemplated a compulsory move towards monthly rental-income filing for individuals. Our June commentary accordingly described rental compliance as moving towards a mandatory monthly rhythm.
Section 124 now provides that an individual required to pay rental tax may furnish a provisional return of rental income on a monthly basis.
Our interpretation of this amendment is that it does not operate as a general statutory requirement for individual landlords to file provisional rental-income returns monthly. A taxpayer may therefore elect to file a monthly return or continue to account for tax under the prior existing framework.
Relief Remains Targeted and Conditional
Another theme that survives the legislative process is the selective character of the relief contained in the Income Tax amendments. The relief is generally directed towards particular projects, investments or taxpayer categories rather than operating as a broad reduction across the business community.
The exemption for income of the Bujagali hydro-power project is extended to 30 June 2032.
The Act also exempts qualifying income of a developer of a hotel or tourism facility whose investment capital is at least USD 10 million in the case of a foreigner or USD 5 million in the case of a citizen. The developer must, subject to availability, use at least 70% locally sourced raw materials, employ at least 70% citizens, and the aggregate wage earned by those citizen employees must amount to at least 70% of the total wage bill.
The commercial importance of the provision lies as much in these conditions as in the exemption itself. An investor should therefore not approach the provision simply as a tourism tax holiday. Eligibility depends on investment structure, capital levels, sourcing, employment composition and the evidence necessary to demonstrate compliance with the statutory thresholds.
The Act also expands the bad-debt provisions to include microfinance deposit-taking institutions and Tier 4 microfinance institutions in the relevant statutory framework. This gives enacted form to an element of the relief package previously identified as bringing tax treatment closer to the commercial credit-risk environment faced by lenders serving smaller borrowers.
Excise Duty: Final Rates Now Feed Directly into Pricing and Supply Chains
Excise duty remains one of the most commercially sensitive parts of the amendments because many of the affected products sit inside transport, construction, manufacturing, food, packaging and retail supply chains.
Excise duty remains the part of the package most likely to move quickly through prices and supply chains, but the commercial impact must now be assessed against the final statutory rates rather than the figures discussed during the legislative process.
The final Act provides, among others, the following rates:
| Item | Final rate under the Act |
| Imported undenatured spirits of alcoholic strength by volume below 80% | 80% or UGX 3,500 per litre, whichever is higher |
| Cement, adhesives, grout, white cement or lime | UGX 750 per 50 kg |
| Motor spirit (gasoline) | UGX 1,750 per litre |
| Gas oil (automotive, light amber, for high-speed engines) | UGX 1,430 per litre |
| Cane or beet sugar and chemically pure sucrose in solid form | UGX 200 per kg |
| Specified plastics and relevant plastic granules, subject to statutory exclusions | 2.5% or USD 70 per tonne, whichever is higher |
| Cooking oil | UGX 400 per litre |
| Motorcycles at first registration | UGX 500,000 |
| Locally manufactured or produced paints, varnishes and lacquers | 3% or UGX 50 per litre or kg, whichever is higher |
| Imported paints, varnishes and lacquers | 10% or UGX 2,000 per litre or kg, whichever is higher |
| Cooking fat | UGX 500 per litre or kg |
These measures do not operate in economic isolation. Fuel costs feed into transport, logistics, agriculture, manufacturing and distribution. Cement, adhesives, grout and related products influence construction costs. Cooking oil, sugar and cooking fat move through food production and household consumption. Packaging taxes can affect manufacturing choices and product pricing. Motorcycle registration costs may affect delivery businesses, ride-hailing and other forms of small-scale commerce.
The analysis developed in our earlier commentary therefore survives. The difference is that businesses should now model the effect using the rates contained in the final Act.
What Did Not Survive
Several measures that featured prominently in the Income Tax Bill and in our earlier analysis do not appear in the signed Income Tax (Amendment) Act. These include:
- the proposed treatment of income arising from disposal of a non-business asset;
- the proposed withholding mechanism connected with purchases of non-business assets;
- the proposed rule concerning taxation of foreign-source income of resident individuals at the equivalent domestic rate; and
- the proposed 0.5% gross-income/minimum-tax style charge associated with losses carried for more than seven years.
The last proposal was among the more controversial provisions identified at Bill stage because it raised the possibility that a business with genuine long-term losses could nevertheless face tax calculated by reference to gross income.
For businesses, several steps are now imperative: updating payroll, reviewing withholding points, checking financing and related-party arrangements, testing eligibility for incentives, revisiting excise-sensitive pricing, and ensuring that tax systems reflect the law now in force.
This commentary is for information only and does not constitute legal or tax advice.
Market Rankings:
EXLORE ALL OUR IN-DEPTH INSIGHTS HERE
Register participation
Discover more from MRT Tax
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
You’re doing the Lord’s Work 👏🏼